You cannot only focus on the earnings
statement and forget the balance sheet while you are analysing the
earnings power of the company. Earnings statements change faster than
the balance sheet. When you do it that way, the method of evaluating
the real value of the earnings power varies more. It is easier to
come to wrong conclusion about the real earnings power of the
business. You will get a better evaluation by using the changes in
the balance sheet to confirm the earnings statement. Checking the
changes in the balance sheet in the long run produces better picture
of the reality of the business.
Graham divides the analysis of the
earnings to three different perspectives:
- Accounting perspective: What are the real earnings in the period you are checking?
- Business perspective: What signs of the earnings power of the future can be found from the earnings statement?
- Financing perspective: What parts of the earnings statement you should take into consideration and what standards you should follow to get a realistic picture about the real value of the stocks?
You should forget the one time earnings
when you are trying to find the real earnings of the year. These one
time earnings are selling your assets, deferred taxes and the changes
in the intangible assets like goodwill. These things do not tell much
about the earnings power of the future. Most often, they just distort
the conclusions of the analysis. You should also think about the real
value of the subsidiaries´ depreciation and earnings. Consider their
value for the company yourself. They can be over- or undervalued in
the earnings report.
You can evaluate the earnings power of
the future from the past earnings statements, including the last one.
It doesn´t really mean that you should expect that everything will
continue the same as before. Analyzing the past is the least
satisfying part of the analysis. It can nevertheless be the most
important part. In most cases, you cannot rely on the past in the
future. The speed of change is accelerating in many businesses. You
have to evaluate the earnings power in the long run. The most
important factors for Graham were:
- Physical volume
- Unit price
- Unit cost
- Taxes
An analyst has to evaluate them. The
result of the analysis cannot be very accurate. It only gives a
direction where the business might be going. You should think about
the range, not the accurate number. The list is pretty short. It does
not give you all the details about the business. It can give you an
illusion of being right. Sometimes simple ways are better. Single
earnings statement is not enough to give you a reliable conclusion
about the business. It can be usable if it gives you enough proofs
about the future. Graham said that you can use a single earnings
report if it fulfills the next conditions: The earnings report was
not exceptional, business has shown an increasing trend for many
years and the analyst is convinced that business is in the growing
industry. This can give him a proof of a continuing trend in the
industry and business.
Graham believed that the longer
inspection period should have been something between five and ten
years. He used the averages of from five to ten years. He changed his
opinions throughout his career. The better way to think about the
period is trying to figure out the business cycle of the industry and
the business. If you happen to use the time period which is from the
bottom of the business cycle to the top, average earnings growth can
give you an inflated result. You have to remember that not all the
businesses have the same business cycles in the same industry. And
they can have more variation in the different industries. You also
have to remember that business cycles are not always easy to figure
out. Sometimes it is even impossible.
It is easier to forecast the business
cycles of the industries than individual companies. The advantages of
using the long period is balancing out the effects of the business
cycles and making it easier to evaluate the continuation of the
earnings trend. Sometimes there are dying industries and businesses
and it is not always easy to figure out them on time. Fast changes
make forecasting impossible. You have to take this into
consideration, when you see great changes happening in the industry
or business you are analysing. Sometimes it is better to find easier
businesses to analyse and forget the hard ones.
Homework: Try
to find a company and figure out the length of its business cycle.
Then find out the earnings during the cycle for the company. Then, go
through the earnings statements and look for any non-recurring items.
See how much the real earnings are for the business cycle and compare
this figure with the first one. Then, check the reasons for the
non-recurring items. Are they one time only losses or profits or are
they normal for the company? Has it done many restructurings of the
business or mass-layoffs? Mass-layoffs are signs of poor management
or complete changes in the business environment. Continual
restructurings can also tell you about poor cost management in the
company or management´s poor ability to understand the business.
Have a nice end of the week!
-TT
No comments:
Post a Comment